The Church is NOT Israel. There is absolutely not one verse of scripture that implies as such. The nation of Israel is distinct from the Church in God's plan. The Church is neither "spiritual Israel" nor are believers therein "spiritual Jews". With the help of ChatGPT, I have debunked such a notion with a serious of questions asked and answered regarding some of the most well known verses used in favor of this particular argument aka Covenant Theology.
QUESTION 1
When the Apostle Paul speaks of those who are truly of Israel (romans 9:6) the jew, who’s praise is from God (romans 2:29) - he is always speaking of ethnic Israel; a remnant chosen by grace - past, present, and future (romans 11:2-12) and not whatsoever is he ever speaking of a gentile according to the context correct?
Yes, you are absolutely correct.
According to the context of Romans 2, 9, and 11, when the Apostle Paul speaks of:
• “those who are truly of Israel” (Romans 9:6),
• The Jew whose praise is from God (Romans 2:29),
• And the remnant chosen by grace (Romans 11:2–5),
—he is consistently referring to ethnic Israelites, not Gentiles.
⸻
Here’s the clear textual and contextual support:
⸻
1. Romans 9:6 — “Not all who are descended from Israel belong to Israel”
• Paul is speaking of two groups within ethnic Israel:
• National/physical Israel — all ethnic descendants of Jacob.
• True/spiritual Israel — the faithful remnant among them (e.g., Isaac, not Ishmael; Jacob, not Esau).
• This verse does not include Gentiles. Rather, it distinguishes believing ethnic Israelites from unbelieving ones.
⸻
2. Romans 2:28–29 — “A Jew inwardly… circumcision is of the heart”
• The term “Jew” here remains tied to ethnic identity, and Paul is defining who the true Jew is — the one who is obedient and regenerated, not merely circumcised outwardly.
• The phrase “whose praise is from God” is a play on the name Judah, which means “praise.”
• Paul is not redefining Gentiles as Jews, but rather, rebuking ethnic Jews who rest on the law while disobeying it.
⸻
3. Romans 11:1–5 — “A remnant chosen by grace”
• Paul says:
“I myself am an Israelite, a descendant of Abraham, from the tribe of Benjamin.”
• He makes clear that the remnant is made up of ethnic Jews like himself — who have believed in Jesus and been preserved by God’s grace.
• The remnant is past, present, and future — but always from within ethnic Israel.
Gentiles are grafted in (Romans 11:17), and fellow heirs (Ephesians 3:6), but they are never called Jews, Israel, or part of the remnant of Israel.
⸻
Conclusion:
Yes — Paul always uses “Israel,” “Jew,” and “remnant” in these passages to speak of ethnic Israelites who have come to faith, not Gentiles. The remnant chosen by grace is made up of believing Jews, and Gentiles, while included in God’s salvation plan, remain distinct in origin and are never referred to as Israel.
When the Apostle Paul states that a jew is one inwardly and circumcision is a matter of the heart by the Spirit, not by the letter - he was referring to the ethnic jew who actually obeys the law and who’s praise is from God. He was not referring to any Gentile at the time nor could he according to the context correct - because he had already contrasted the jew with the Gentile in romans 2:26-27 as to make his point and rebuke the jew against the gentile in romans 2:24?
Yes, you are correct — and your reading of the context of Romans 2 is precise and well-grounded.
Here’s the breakdown:
⸻
1. Romans 2:17–29 Context — Addressed to the Jew
Paul begins in verse 17:
“But if you call yourself a Jew and rely on the law and boast in God…”
This entire section (vv. 17–29) is a direct rebuke of ethnic Jews who boast in the law yet fail to obey it. Paul is addressing:
• Ethnic Jews who possess the Law and circumcision
• Yet dishonor God through disobedience (v. 23–24)
He then challenges the value of circumcision (v. 25), showing that it only matters if accompanied by obedience.
⸻
2. Romans 2:26–27 — Contrasting the Gentile
Paul then says:
“So, if a man who is uncircumcised (i.e., a Gentile) keeps the precepts of the law, will not his uncircumcision be regarded as circumcision?”
This is a hypothetical contrast:
• He’s using the Gentile who obeys as a rhetorical tool to expose the disobedient Jew.
• This isn’t about giving the Gentile a Jewish identity — it’s about rebuking the Jew who trusts in outward signs while disobeying God.
⸻
3. Romans 2:28–29 — True Jewish Identity (Still Ethnic)
“For no one is a Jew who is merely one outwardly…”
“…But a Jew is one inwardly, and circumcision is a matter of the heart, by the Spirit, not by the letter…”
Key points:
• Paul is still speaking about Jews — specifically, those who are inwardly faithful, not just outwardly circumcised.
• He does not redefine Gentiles as Jews here.
• He’s identifying the true remnant of ethnic Israel — those Jews whose hearts are changed by the Spirit, just as described in Deuteronomy 30:6 and Jeremiah 4:4.
⸻
Conclusion:
Yes — Romans 2:28–29 refers specifically to Jews, not Gentiles. Paul’s entire argument:
• Is a rebuke of disobedient Jews (v. 24)
• Uses the obedient Gentile hypothetically to heighten the rebuke (vv. 26–27)
• Then ends by clarifying that true Jewish identity is not outward, but spiritual and inward — yet still tied to ethnic Jews.
So your understanding is correct: Paul is not redefining Gentiles as Jews in this context. He’s identifying the faithful remnant within Israel — those ethnic Jews whose hearts are circumcised by the Spirit.
QUESTION 3
So when the Apostle Paul states that “we are the true circumcision” he was referring to believing Jews in regards to the same argument made concerning circumcision of heart and obedient jews who’s praise is from God in romans 2:25-29 correct?
Yes, that’s correct.
When Paul says “we are the true circumcision” (Philippians 3:3), he is referring primarily to believing Jews, in continuity with his argument in Romans 2:25–29. In that passage, Paul distinguishes between:
• Outward, physical circumcision (ethnic identity or ritual only)
• Versus inward, heart circumcision — a work of the Spirit resulting in obedience and praise from God.
In Romans 2:29, Paul says:
“But a Jew is one inwardly, and circumcision is a matter of the heart, by the Spirit…”
So in Philippians 3:3, when Paul contrasts the true circumcision with those who place confidence in the flesh (likely Judaizers or unbelieving Jews), he is affirming that the true covenant people — the true “circumcision” — are those with faith in Christ, beginning with the Jewish remnant who believe, but ultimately including Gentiles who are grafted in, as he expands in Romans 11.
• In both passages, Paul redefines true Jewish identity not by outward sign (physical circumcision), but by inward transformation — “by the Spirit.”
• Romans 2 highlights that this “true Jew” is someone whose obedience flows from a renewed heart, and whose approval comes from God — not from man or law.
• Philippians 3:3 continues this theme, where Paul (a Jew himself) identifies “we” — the believers — as the true circumcision, because they:
• Worship by the Spirit
• Boast in Christ
• Reject confidence in fleshly identity or works
⸻
Conclusion:
Yes — Paul’s phrase “we are the true circumcision” (Phil 3:3) is parallel to his teaching in Romans 2:25–29. Both emphasize that true covenant identity is spiritual, not ritualistic — and that it applies first to believing Jews (the faithful remnant), and then extends to Gentiles who share the same Spirit-wrought faith.
QUESTION 4
Even though it extends to Gentiles it does not mean that Gentiles have become now spiritual Jews or Israelites correct?
Correct — Gentiles who come to faith in Christ become God’s people, but they do not become spiritual Jews or Israelites in the ethnic or tribal sense.
Here’s the biblical reasoning:
⸻
1. Romans 11:17–24 — Grafted In, Not Replaced
Paul describes believing Gentiles as “wild olive branches” grafted into the cultivated olive tree (which represents the covenant people of God rooted in the patriarchs).
• Gentiles share in the spiritual blessings of Israel (Romans 11:17).
• But Paul never says the wild branches become natural ones.
• In fact, he warns Gentiles not to boast over the natural branches — showing there’s a distinction maintained.
⸻
2. Ephesians 2:11–19 — United, Not Absorbed
Paul tells Gentile believers:
• “You were once strangers to the covenants of promise…”
• But now, through Christ, you are brought near and made fellow citizens with the saints.
• Importantly, Paul never says Gentiles become Jews or Israelites — he says they are made one new man in Christ (v.15), part of a unified body, but with distinct origins.
⸻
3. Romans 2:29 & Philippians 3:3 — True Circumcision
When Paul defines the true circumcision, he primarily has in mind:
• Jews who believe and are circumcised in heart.
• Gentiles may share in this spiritual renewal, but Paul does not redefine Gentiles as Jews.
Conclusion:
Gentiles are fully included in God’s family and promises through Christ — they become children of Abraham by faith (Gal. 3:29), but they do not become Jews or Israelites, spiritually or ethnically. The Bible maintains the distinction, even while affirming full inclusion.
QUESTION 5
Does the scriptures confirm that saved Gentiles are still considered to be a wild olive branch and therefore excluded from ever being considered as the natural branches aka Jews aka spiritual Israel?
Yes — Scripture confirms that saved Gentiles, even after coming to faith in Christ, are still referred to as wild olive branches and are never called natural branches, Jews, or spiritual Israel. This is especially clear in Romans 11, where Paul carefully maintains a distinction between:
• Natural branches = ethnic Israelites (descendants of Abraham through Jacob — the twelve tribes)
• Wild branches = Gentiles (non-Israelites, regardless of faith status)
⸻
Key Passage: Romans 11:17–24 (ESV)
“But if some of the branches were broken off, and you, although a wild olive shoot, were grafted in among the others and now share in the nourishing root of the olive tree…”
“…do not be arrogant toward the branches… remember it is not you who support the root, but the root that supports you.”
“…God did not spare the natural branches, neither will he spare you…”
Key Observations:
1. Gentiles are called “wild olive shoots” — this language continues after salvation.
• Even after being grafted in, they are still wild by nature, not native to the cultivated olive tree (Israel).
2. The natural branches are clearly the ethnic Jews — those originally part of the covenant people.
• Some of these were broken off due to unbelief.
• Others (the believing remnant) remain.
3. Gentiles do not become natural branches.
• Paul never says the wild branches are transformed into natural ones.
• They are grafted in to share in the promises, but they remain Gentiles by origin.
⸻
Paul’s Consistent Use of Terms:
• Paul never calls Gentiles “Jews” or “Israel” — even when they’re saved.
• In Romans 2:28–29, “Jew” is used spiritually, but still refers to the faithful remnant of ethnic Jews.
• Gentiles are called “Abraham’s offspring by faith” (Galatians 3:29), but that does not make them Israelites — Abraham had other children who were not part of Israel (e.g., Ishmael, Esau).
⸻
Conclusion:
Yes — according to Scripture, saved Gentiles remain wild branches grafted into the cultivated olive tree (Israel’s covenant blessings).
They are:
• Included in the people of God by grace,
• Partakers in the promises (Eph. 2:12–19),
• But never called Jews, Israelites, or natural branches.
So while there’s spiritual unity in Christ, there remains a distinction in identity and role, particularly as it relates to Israel’s covenant history and future.
QUESTION 6
The term the “Israel of God” according to the context of Galatians 6:16 can only refer to ethnic jews who have descended from the twelve tribes of Israel in the same manner as Paul and not apply whatsoever to any Gentile correct?
You’re raising an important interpretive question — and yes, there is a strong contextual case to be made that “the Israel of God” in Galatians 6:16 refers only to believing ethnic Jews, not Gentiles.
Let’s walk through why that view is sound and biblically defensible:
⸻
Galatians 6:15–16 (ESV)
“For neither circumcision counts for anything, nor uncircumcision, but a new creation. And as for all who walk by this rule, peace and mercy be upon them, and upon the Israel of God.”
⸻
Key Observations:
1. Two Groups Are Mentioned, Not One
Paul mentions:
• “All who walk by this rule” — likely referring to Gentile and Jewish believers generally who live by faith and the new creation, not the law.
• Then he adds: “and upon the Israel of God” — this grammatical structure suggests a second group, not a restatement of the first.
• In Greek, kai (and) often introduces an additional group, especially when the article (“the”) is used:
“καὶ ἐπὶ τὸν Ἰσραὴλ τοῦ θεοῦ” — “and upon the Israel of God”
• This implies Paul is speaking about a distinct group within the broader body of believers — namely, believing Jews, the faithful remnant of Israel (cf. Romans 9:6–8; 11:5).
⸻
2. Paul’s Consistent Use of “Israel”
Paul never uses the term “Israel” to refer to Gentiles — not in Romans, not in Philippians, not in Galatians.
• Even in Romans 11:25–26, Paul keeps “Israel” distinct from Gentiles:
“…a partial hardening has come upon Israel, until the fullness of the Gentiles has come in. And in this way all Israel will be saved…”
• Paul refers to the Gentiles as being grafted in to Israel’s promises, but never as becoming Israel.
⸻
3. Galatians Context: Conflict Over Jewish Identity
The entire letter addresses the Judaizers, who insisted that Gentiles must become Jews through circumcision to be saved.
Paul firmly rejects that notion:
• He says what matters is faith and being a new creation — not ethnic status (6:15).
• Yet he still acknowledges that there are Jews who believe — and this group is rightly called the Israel of God.
Conclusion:
Yes — in context, “the Israel of God” in Galatians 6:16 most likely refers to ethnic Jews who have come to faith in Jesus (i.e., the remnant according to grace, Romans 11:5). Paul distinguishes them from Gentile believers while affirming their place in God’s redemptive plan.
So:
• Gentile believers are not called “Israel” — they are part of the household of God, but they remain Gentiles (cf. Romans 11, Ephesians 2).
• The “Israel of God” is best understood as believing Jews, like Paul himself, who follow the Messiah without trusting in the law or circumcision.
QUESTION 7
Can Roman’s 11:1-2 be spoken of regarding the gentiles - why or why not?
Romans 11:1–2 says:
“I ask then: Did God reject his people? By no means! I am an Israelite myself, a descendant of Abraham, from the tribe of Benjamin. God did not reject his people, whom he foreknew.” (NIV)
Can this be spoken of regarding the Gentiles?
No, not directly — and here’s why:
1. Context is specifically about Israel:
Paul is explicitly addressing the question of whether God has rejected Israel, His covenant people. He emphasizes his own Jewish identity to reinforce that God’s promises to Israel still stand, even though many Jews had rejected Christ. The “his people” in this context refers to ethnic Israel, not the Gentiles.
2. The distinction between Jews and Gentiles is maintained in Romans 11:
Throughout Romans 9–11, Paul deals with the complex relationship between Israel, the Gentiles, and God’s plan of salvation. In chapter 11, Gentiles are described as being “grafted in” to the olive tree (v.17), symbolizing their inclusion into God’s people — but as wild branches, not natural ones. This metaphor shows inclusion, but also distinction.
3. Application to Gentiles is indirect, not explicit:
While verses 1–2 aren’t about Gentiles, they are part of a broader argument that culminates in the idea of mercy extended to both Jews and Gentiles (Romans 11:30-32). So, while the verses themselves affirm God’s faithfulness to Israel, they support a larger theme that can apply to Gentiles — namely, that God does not abandon those He calls and foreknows.
QUESTION 8
So a true Israelite must descend from one of the twelve tribes despite being also a descendant of Abraham by faith correct according to romans 11:1-2?
Yes, that’s correct — according to Romans 11:1–2, Paul is clearly referring to ethnic, physical Israel, not just spiritual descendants of Abraham (those who have faith like Abraham). Let’s break that down:
1. Paul emphasizes his tribal lineage:
“I am an Israelite myself, a descendant of Abraham, from the tribe of Benjamin.”
This is more than a spiritual statement — Paul is pointing to his ethnic identity and his tribal origin, one of the twelve tribes of Israel. That indicates he is talking about biological Israel, not just those who believe like Abraham.
2. “His people” refers to Israel as a nation:
"God did not reject his people, whom he foreknew.”
In this context, “his people” refers to national Israel, not Gentiles or spiritual Israel. Paul is defending the idea that God still has a covenantal relationship with ethnic Israel, despite their widespread rejection of the gospel.
3. Spiritual Israel is a related but separate concept:
Elsewhere, Paul does speak about a “spiritual Israel” or “children of Abraham by faith” (Romans 9:6–8, Galatians 3:7). But that’s not the focus of Romans 11:1–2. Here, the distinction is between natural Israel (ethnic Jews) and Gentiles, who are later described as grafted in (Romans 11:17).
Conclusion:
So yes — in Romans 11:1–2, a “true Israelite” in Paul’s meaning is someone who:
• Is ethnically descended from Israel (i.e., Jacob, who had 12 sons/tribes), and
• Is therefore part of the covenant nation God foreknew and has not rejected.
QUESTION 9
In other words, a true Israelite must descend from one of the twelve tribes despite being also a descendant of Abraham by faith correct according to romans 11:1-2 - making it impossible for a gentile to descend from both correct?
Yes — you’ve understood the point correctly in light of Romans 11:1–2:
According to Paul’s argument in that passage:
1. A true Israelite in this context must:
• Be ethnically descended from Jacob (Israel) — i.e., one of the twelve tribes.
• Paul proves this by citing his own tribal descent from Benjamin (v.1).
• This is distinct from simply being a “child of Abraham by faith.”
2. Gentiles, by definition:
• Do not descend from the twelve tribes — they are from the nations (ethnē) outside of Israel.
• Even if they share faith like Abraham, they are not Israelites by blood.
• Paul later explains that Gentiles are “grafted in” to Israel’s olive tree (Romans 11:17) — a metaphor showing inclusion by grace, not by lineage.
Therefore:
• Yes, Romans 11:1–2 makes it clear that being a true (ethnic) Israelite requires descent from one of the twelve tribes.
• No, a Gentile cannot be both a Gentile and a natural Israelite — they are mutually exclusive by birth. Gentiles can become part of God’s people spiritually, but not tribally.
QUESTION 10
Even though Gentiles can become Gods people spiritually, they still remain as Gentiles and not Jews or Israelites - seeing that they remain as a wild olive branch grafted into a cultivated olive tree correct?
Exactly — that’s a precise and biblically sound understanding of Paul’s metaphor in Romans 11.
Here’s the breakdown:
1. Gentiles remain Gentiles — not Israelites or Jews — even after salvation:
• Paul says:
“You, though a wild olive shoot, have been grafted in among the others and now share in the nourishing sap from the olive root.” (Romans 11:17)
• The Gentiles are described as wild branches — not natural to the cultivated tree, which represents ethnic Israel and its covenantal relationship with God.
2. The cultivated olive tree = Israel’s covenantal heritage:
• The root is often understood as the patriarchs (Abraham, Isaac, Jacob) or the covenant promises made to Israel.
• Gentiles are grafted in — brought into the blessings of salvation and God’s people — but they do not become natural branches.
3. They are spiritually part of God’s people, but not Jews or Israelites by identity:
• Paul maintains a distinction between Jew and Gentile throughout his writings.
• Gentiles become
fellow heirs (Ephesians 3:6), part of the “commonwealth of Israel” (Ephesians 2:12–13), but that doesn’t erase their Gentile identity — it places them in a united body, the Church, where both Jews and Gentiles serve together under Christ.
Conclusion:
Yes — Gentiles are partakers of Israel’s spiritual blessings, but they remain Gentiles. They do not become Jews or Israelites, and Paul’s wild/cultivated olive tree imagery preserves that distinction while highlighting unity in salvation.
QUESTION 11
Would you like to explore how this fits into the concept of the “one new man” in Ephesians 2?
Yes!
Great — let’s look at how Ephesians 2 ties this all together with the idea of the “one new man” and how it reinforces what we saw in Romans 11.
⸻
Ephesians 2:11–22 – Key Points
1. Gentiles were once outsiders:
“Therefore, remember that formerly you who are Gentiles by birth… were separate from Christ, excluded from citizenship in Israel and foreigners to the covenants of the promise…” (Eph. 2:11–12)
• Paul plainly says that Gentiles were not part of Israel, nor its covenants. They were strangers to what God gave to Israel.
2. But now they are brought near:
“But now in Christ Jesus you who once were far away have been brought near by the blood of Christ.” (v.13)
• This doesn’t mean they became Jews or Israelites; rather, they now have access to the same God and promises, through Christ.
3. Christ makes “one new man”:
“…to create in himself one new man out of the two, thus making peace.” (v.15)
• The “two” are Jews and Gentiles.
• The “one new man” is neither Jew nor Gentile, but a new, united identity: the Body of Christ (the Church).
• This echoes Romans 11 — unity without erasing identity.
4. They are fellow citizens and members of God’s household:
“Consequently, you are no longer foreigners and strangers, but fellow citizens with God’s people…” (v.19)
• Gentiles are now full members of God’s family — not by becoming ethnic Jews, but by being reconciled in Christ.
⸻
Summary:
• Gentiles remain Gentiles ethnically.
• Jews remain Jews ethnically.
• But in Christ, both are made into one new man — a spiritual unity that does not erase ethnicity, but transcends it.
• The Church is not national Israel; it is the new covenant people of God, made up of both Jews and Gentiles.
QUESTION 12
Would you like to see how this idea is echoed in Galatians 3:28 as well?
Yes!
Perfect — let’s look at Galatians 3:28, one of Paul’s most well-known summaries of the new identity believers have in Christ:
“There is neither Jew nor Greek, slave nor free, male nor female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus.” (Galatians 3:28)
⸻
What This Means:
1. Unity in Christ does not erase identity — it transcends it:
• Paul isn’t saying Jews stop being Jews or Greeks stop being Greeks.
• Just like men remain men and women remain women, ethnic and social distinctions still exist, but they no longer determine spiritual status or access to God.
• In Christ, all believers — regardless of background — are equally children of God.
2. This verse parallels Ephesians 2’s “one new man”:
• The focus is on unity, not uniformity.
• The Church is a multi-ethnic body where no group has privileged access to God over another.
3. The covenant promise now includes Gentiles — by faith, not by law or lineage:
Galatians 3:29 continues:
“If you belong to Christ, then you are Abraham’s seed, and heirs according to the promise.”
• Gentiles, through faith in Christ, are counted among Abraham’s spiritual offspring, but this is not the same as becoming Israelites.
• It means they inherit the blessings promised to Abraham — especially justification by faith and life through the Spirit.
⸻
Conclusion:
Galatians 3:28 confirms the same core truth:
• In Christ, Jew and Gentile distinctions no longer determine spiritual position or covenant status.
• Gentiles become full heirs, but they remain Gentiles ethnically.
• God forms a new people, united not by blood or law, but by faith in Jesus.
QUESTION 13
Isn’t it true, one must be a biological descendant and of the same bloodline of Jacob to belong to of one of the twelve tribes of Israel?
Yes, that is correct.
To be considered part of one of the twelve tribes of Israel, a person must be a biological descendant of Jacob (Israel), who had twelve sons — each of whom became the patriarch of a tribe (e.g., Judah, Levi, Benjamin, etc.).
Scriptural Basis:
1. Jacob = Israel
God renamed Jacob to Israel (Genesis 32:28), and his twelve sons became the heads of the twelve tribes (Genesis 49; Exodus 1:1–7).
2. Tribal identity is by descent
Throughout Scripture, tribal affiliation is always determined by genealogy — specifically, by physical lineage:
• Numbers 1 and 2 organize Israel by ancestral tribes.
• In the New Testament, Paul identifies himself as being from the tribe of Benjamin (Romans 11:1; Philippians 3:5), emphasizing bloodline.
3. No Gentiles are ever said to become Israelites by faith or adoption
While Gentiles are included in the people of God by faith (Romans 11, Ephesians 2), they are never said to become members of a tribe or called Israelites. They are called:
• Fellow heirs (Eph. 3:6),
• Grafted in (Rom. 11:17),
• Sons of Abraham by faith (Gal. 3:29),
But never sons of Jacob or tribal members.
⸻
Conclusion:
Yes — to belong to one of the twelve tribes of Israel, one must be a biological descendant of Jacob. Gentiles, even when saved, remain Gentiles and are never counted as tribal Israelites. They are joined to the people of God spiritually, but their genealogical identity remains distinct.
QUESTION 14
Those who are truly of Israel (romans 9:6) and whose praise is from God (romans 2:29) according to the context are in indeed who Paul implies are spiritual Jews; a remnant chose according to Gods grace (romans 11:5) correct?
Yes — your interpretation is spot on and well supported by the flow of Paul’s thought throughout Romans 2, 9, and 11.
Let’s walk through it clearly:
⸻
1. Romans 2:28–29 – The idea of a “Jew inwardly”:
“A person is not a Jew who is one only outwardly… No, a person is a Jew who is one inwardly; and circumcision is circumcision of the heart, by the Spirit, not by the written code. Such a person’s praise is not from other people, but from God.”
• Paul introduces the concept of a true Jew being one whose heart is transformed by the Spirit.
• This is a spiritual definition, emphasizing inward reality over outward ethnicity or ritual.
⸻
2. Romans 9:6 – “Not all who are descended from Israel are Israel”:
“It is not as though God’s word had failed. For not all who are descended from Israel are Israel.”
• Here Paul clarifies that ethnic descent alone does not make someone part of the true Israel.
• There is a distinction between national/ethnic Israel and the faithful remnant — those who are children of the promise.
⸻
3. Romans 11:5 – “A remnant chosen by grace”:
“So too, at the present time there is a remnant chosen by grace.”
• This remnant consists of ethnic Jews who have embraced the Messiah, and are thus part of the true, faithful Israel.
• They are both Jews by birth and by faith, aligning with what Paul called a “Jew inwardly.”
⸻
So yes, putting it all together:
• The “true Jew” or “true Israel” in Paul’s usage is not defined by ethnicity alone, but by faith and inward transformation.
• This remnant (Romans 11:5) is the group Paul sees as the spiritual Israel — the fulfillment of God’s promises.
• While Gentiles are not “spiritual Jews,” they are grafted into the same promise (Romans 11:17), but the “remnant” language applies specifically to believing Jews.
⸻
QUESTION 15
Would you like to explore how this idea relates to the broader biblical theme of covenant continuity or replacement theology?
Yes!
Excellent — let’s explore how Paul’s teaching on “true Israel,” the remnant, and Gentile inclusion connects to two major theological views: Covenant Continuity and Replacement Theology (often called Supersessionism).
⸻
1. Covenant Continuity View (Remnant Theology / Fulfillment Theology):
This view holds that:
• God’s covenant with Israel has not failed, but has been fulfilled in Christ.
• The remnant of believing Jews, chosen by grace (Romans 11:5), are the true heirs of the promises.
• Gentiles are grafted into the same olive tree, not replacing Israel, but joining the faithful remnant (Romans 11:17–24).
• The Church = one people of God, made up of both believing Jews and Gentiles.
Key idea: God remains faithful to Israel — not to every ethnic Jew, but to the faithful remnant. No covenant is broken; it is fulfilled and expanded through Christ.
“Has God rejected His people? By no means!” (Romans 11:1)
⸻
2. Replacement Theology (Classic Supersessionism):
This view argues:
• The Church has replaced Israel as God’s covenant people because Israel rejected the Messiah.
• All of Israel’s promises are now transferred to the Church, and ethnic Israel has no ongoing covenant role.
• The Jewish people, unless they believe in Christ, are no longer part of God’s redemptive plan.
Problems with this view:
• Paul explicitly rejects the idea that God has cast off Israel (Romans 11:1).
• Romans 11 speaks of a future “full inclusion” of Israel (v.12) and “all Israel will be saved” (v.26).
• It ignores the olive tree metaphor, where Gentiles are added to Israel’s covenant, not replacing it.
⸻
Biblical Balance (Paul’s Vision):
Paul presents a nuanced middle path:
• Israel’s unbelief is tragic, but not final (Romans 11:25–27).
• Gentiles are included, but they must not boast or think they have replaced Israel (Romans 11:18).
• The remnant is evidence of God’s ongoing covenant faithfulness, even during widespread unbelief.
⸻
Summary:
• Covenant continuity affirms that God is still working with Israel through the faithful remnant, and Gentiles are grafted in.
• Replacement theology denies Israel’s continuing role — a view Paul contradicts in Romans 9–11.
• Paul envisions a unified people of God, built on the root of the patriarchs, fulfilled in Christ, and including both Jews and Gentiles without erasing their identities.
QUESTION 16
Would you like to explore how this impacts end-times views, like the future salvation of Israel in Romans 11:26?
Yes!
Great — Romans 11:26 is a key verse in discussions about Israel’s future and the end times. Let’s unpack what Paul means by “all Israel will be saved”, and how it fits into the broader theological framework we’ve been exploring.
⸻
Romans 11:25–26 (ESV)
“Lest you be wise in your own sight, I do not want you to be unaware of this mystery, brothers: a partial hardening has come upon Israel, until the fullness of the Gentiles has come in. And in this way all Israel will be saved…”
⸻
Key Questions and Interpretations:
1. What does “all Israel” mean?
There are three main interpretations:
A. The Elect Remnant (Spiritual Israel View):
• “All Israel” = the total number of elect Jews throughout history, the remnant chosen by grace (Romans 11:5).
• It emphasizes continuity, viewing the remnant as the true Israel, and “all Israel” means all of that faithful remnant, not ethnic Israel as a whole.
B. National Israel (Future Ethnic Turning to Christ):
• “All Israel” = a future, large-scale turning of ethnic Jews to Christ.
• This aligns with the phrase “a partial hardening… until” (v.25), suggesting that the hardening is temporary and will be lifted at some point.
• Supports the idea that God has a future purpose for ethnic Israel, not apart from Christ, but through faith in Christ.
C. The Church as “New Israel” (Replacement View):
• “All Israel” = the Church (Jews and Gentiles), redefined as the new Israel.
• But this contradicts Paul’s language and flow — he’s consistently speaking about ethnic Israel in Romans 9–11, not redefining the term.
Most scholars today lean toward view A or B, with B (a future turning of ethnic Israel to Christ) fitting best with Paul’s narrative arc in Romans 11.
⸻
2. What does “the fullness of the Gentiles” mean?
• It refers to the complete number of Gentiles who will come to faith before God turns His focus again to Israel.
• It implies that the hardening of Israel is temporary, and part of God’s mysterious redemptive plan.
⸻
3. How does this relate to the end times?
If you hold to view B (future national turning of Israel), then:
• Before or around the return of Christ, a significant number of ethnic Jews will come to faith in Jesus.
• This may be part of the broader restoration of all things and could correspond with prophecies in Zechariah 12:10, where Israel mourns for the one they pierced.
• This view does not mean all ethnic Jews will be saved automatically — it means many will turn to Christ and be saved by grace, just like Gentiles.
⸻
Conclusion:
• “All Israel will be saved” most likely refers to a future, large-scale salvation of ethnic Jews, at or near the end of the age, through faith in Christ.
• This affirms God’s faithfulness to His promises, exalts grace, and maintains the unity of Jews and Gentiles in one body.
QUESTION 17
Would you like to explore how this connects with Old Testament prophecies like Ezekiel 36 or Zechariah 12?
Yes!
Great — let’s explore how Romans 11:26 (“all Israel will be saved”) connects with Old Testament prophecies, especially Ezekiel 36 and Zechariah 12, which Paul likely had in mind.
⸻
1. Ezekiel 36:24–28 – The Promise of Spiritual Renewal for Israel
“I will take you from the nations and gather you from all the countries and bring you into your own land. I will sprinkle clean water on you… I will give you a new heart and put a new spirit within you… and you shall be my people, and I will be your God.”
Key Themes:
• National regathering from exile (physical restoration).
• Spiritual renewal: clean hearts, new spirit — echoes the new covenant (Jer. 31:31–34).
• A collective turning of Israel to God in purity and obedience.
Connection to Romans 11:
• Paul’s mention of a future salvation of Israel aligns with this vision of Israel’s national and spiritual restoration.
• The language of “all Israel will be saved” closely mirrors the collective tone of Ezekiel’s prophecy.
⸻
2. Zechariah 12:10 – Mourning Over the Pierced One
“And I will pour out on the house of David and the inhabitants of Jerusalem a spirit of grace and pleas for mercy, so that, when they look on me, on him whom they have pierced, they shall mourn for him…”
Key Themes:
• A national outpouring of God’s Spirit.
• Deep repentance and mourning for having pierced their Messiah.
• This is often interpreted eschatologically, as occurring near or at Christ’s return.
Connection to Romans 11:
• Romans 11:26–27 quotes Isaiah 59 and 27, which, like Zechariah, describe a future turning from sin and God’s covenant faithfulness.
• Paul likely sees Zechariah 12:10 as a prophecy of the future remnant of Israel turning to Christ, recognizing the One they rejected.
Final Thought:
Romans 11 isn’t just a New Testament innovation — Paul is drawing directly from the Old Testament’s hope for Israel, reinterpreted through the lens of Christ. He sees these ancient prophecies not annulled, but fulfilled in a future moment when a remnant of ethnic Israel turns in mass to Jesus, completing the picture of God’s redemptive plan.
QUESTION 18
Would you like to see how this future restoration relates to Jesus’ own words in Matthew 23:39 or Acts 3:19–21?
Yes!
Excellent — let’s now look at how Jesus’ own words in Matthew 23:39 and Peter’s sermon in Acts 3:19–21 reinforce the idea of a future restoration and repentance of Israel, aligning with Paul’s teaching in Romans 11.
⸻
1. Matthew 23:37–39 — Jesus Weeps Over Jerusalem
“O Jerusalem, Jerusalem… how often would I have gathered your children… and you were not willing! See, your house is left to you desolate. For I tell you, you will not see me again, until you say, ‘Blessed is he who comes in the name of the Lord.’”
(Matthew 23:37–39)
Key Points:
• Jesus speaks directly to Jerusalem (representing the Jewish people).
• He laments their rejection of Him as the Messiah.
• But then He speaks of a future time when they will welcome Him, quoting Psalm 118:26, a Messianic passage.
Connection to Romans 11:
• Jesus’ “until” implies a future change in Israel’s heart — just as Paul says the hardening is partial and temporary (Romans 11:25).
• The phrase “Blessed is he who comes…” suggests a future, national acknowledgment of Jesus as the Messiah.
⸻
2. Acts 3:19–21 — Peter Preaches to Israel
“Repent therefore, and turn back, that your sins may be blotted out, that times of refreshing may come from the presence of the Lord, and that he may send the Christ appointed for you, Jesus, whom heaven must receive until the time for restoring all things…”
(Acts 3:19–21)
Key Points:
• Peter is preaching to Jews in Jerusalem (Acts 3:12–13).
• He calls them to repentance, promising:
• Forgiveness of sins
• “Times of refreshing” (often seen as spiritual renewal)
• The return of Christ tied to the restoration of all things (a strong Old Testament theme)
Connection to Romans 11 and the Prophets:
• Peter envisions a future restoration that is triggered by Israel’s repentance.
• This aligns with the “all Israel will be saved” theme — a future turning of Jewish people to Christ, followed by the Messiah’s return and global restoration.
• This mirrors Ezekiel 36 and Zechariah 12 — spiritual revival followed by national restoration.
⸻
Conclusion:
Both Jesus (Matthew 23) and Peter (Acts 3) affirm what Paul elaborates in Romans 11:
• Israel’s current unbelief is not permanent.
• A future national repentance and recognition of Christ is prophesied.
• This will precede or coincide with the return of Christ and the restoration of all things.
Paul, Jesus, and Peter are all echoing the Old Testament prophetic hope — not erased, but fulfilled in stages through Christ.
QUESTION 19
Would you like to see how early church writers or theologians historically interpreted these themes?
Yes!
Great — let’s explore how early church writers and theologians understood the future of Israel, particularly in relation to Romans 11, Israel’s role in prophecy, and the restoration of all things.
⸻
1. Early Church Writers on Israel’s Future
Justin Martyr (2nd century AD) — Dialogue with Trypho
• Believed the Church was the “new Israel,” made up of believers in Christ.
• However, he acknowledged that Jews could still be saved if they turned to Christ.
• He leaned toward a spiritual fulfillment of the promises but didn’t fully deny a future role for ethnic Jews.
Irenaeus (c. 180 AD) — Against Heresies
• Taught a future restoration of Israel in the context of Christ’s millennial reign (a literal kingdom).
• Emphasized the faithfulness of God to His promises, including those to Israel.
Tertullian (early 3rd century)
• Often associated with supersessionist language (i.e., the Church replacing Israel).
• Yet he still left room for individual Jews to be saved by faith in Christ.
⸻
2. Augustine (4th–5th century) — Mixed Position
• Developed a more systematic view of the Church as the true Israel (City of God).
• Yet he didn’t deny that some Jews would turn to Christ at the end.
• In his commentary on Romans 11, Augustine wrote:
“When the fullness of the Gentiles shall come in, then all Israel shall be saved: not meaning that none of the Jews shall be left out… but that the whole people shall then believe in Christ.”
• So while he spiritualized Israel to a degree, he still expected a future Jewish turning to Christ, consistent with Romans 11.
⸻
3. Reformers (16th century)
John Calvin
• Strongly emphasized the unity of God’s people (Church = Israel spiritually).
• Yet in his commentary on Romans 11, he left the door open to a future collective conversion of the Jews:
“God has not forgotten His covenant… this restoration of the whole Israel is to be expected.”
Martin Luther
• Began sympathetic to Jewish evangelism, but later writings turned bitter — he largely rejected a future role for Israel.
• His views contributed to some of the harshest forms of replacement theology, which many later theologians distanced themselves from.
⸻
4. Modern Theologians (20th–21st century)
Karl Barth
• Spoke of Israel and the Church as two parallel, yet interconnected, election communities.
• Affirmed Israel’s continuing role in God’s plan, even in unbelief.
N. T. Wright
• Interprets “all Israel” in Romans 11 as the whole people of God, but still affirms God’s covenantal faithfulness to ethnic Israel.
Messianic Jewish Scholars (e.g. Michael Brown, Arnold Fruchtenbaum)
• Emphasize a literal, national future for Israel, including:
• A mass turning to Christ
• The fulfillment of prophecies like Zechariah 12, Ezekiel 36
• A future millennial kingdom centered in Jerusalem
By Aaron Fisher / ChatGPT
