The scriptures states that God sent His Son in the likeness of SINFUL FLESH (romans 8:3) !!!!!
Question. Is this “sinful flesh" spoken of in (romans 8:3) a reference to newly born babies as well? YES! Jesus had declared (john 3:6) that which is born of flesh (same Greek word regarding romans 8:3) is flesh and that which is born of Spirit is Spirit. Therefore, since newborn babies are born to the same "sinful" flesh that Jesus was sent into the world in the likeness of - infants along with every other class of people are born with a sinful nature just the same - for you cannot separate the sinner's (fallen) nature (in Adam as sons of disobedience) from the sinner's sinful flesh (which is in hostility towards God); the two are inseparable. For example, if one's flesh is sinful; then one's nature is as well and vice versa. Babies are born in sin; with a sin nature because when babies are born they are born "in Adam" - deserving of God's wrath along with the rest of mankind simply because of their nature alone to which we are all born to. Mind you, mere flesh cannot enter the Kingdom of God; one must be born again - including infants if they are indeed to enter into the Kingdom at all. This is why Ephesians 2:3 speaks of the very nature of which man is born to as deserving of God's wrath because we are born sinful or as sinners in spite of having not done any evil deeds as of yet because our default disposition as a sinner when born is considered to be a slave to sin as to only obey unrighteousness. The very nature to which we are born can ONLY bear fruit which leads to death (romans 7:5). Therefore, the only fruit that any human being can bear according to their sinful nature would lead to condemnation apart from becoming born again. Man's very nature alone to which he was born is enough to send that person to the Lake of Fire, apart from the mercy of God. Sure, the scriptures state that mankind will be judged according to our works; however if one is not able to bear good fruit from any works according to their sinful nature; regardless of whatever defining characteristic you may put forth or assign to the individual - that person will still be condemned because that person while in his flesh apart from any works could NEVER bear fruit to please God nonetheless because of his nature. The unclean or impure according to sinful flesh to which we are born to can't inherit the Kingdom of God; including newborn babies. The "nature" of the sinful baby must be changed in order for that baby to enter the Kingdom - and if the baby's nature must be changed; then prior to the change of that baby's nature; that baby by default could not enter the Kingdom but rather perish as to enter the Lake of Fire along with the rest of wicked sinners.
A FURTHER ARGUMENTATION
There is no condemnation for all those who are "in Christ" - ROMANS 8:1. Therefore, God has the right to judge everyone who is not "in Christ" but are yet still "in Adam" - including babies. Apart from any works; that being good or evil - that baby born “in Adam” is still considered to be a sinner (ROMANS 5:19). Newborn babies are born into the world as a "sons of disobedience" (EPHESIANS 2:2) for this is his or her standing or status in the world; as a sinner. Furthermore, scripture declares God has a right to fashion some individuals as vessels of dishonor having been prepared beforehand (before they are born) for destruction; even though ALL OF MANKIND indeed stands equally condemned already. Consider Esau; his fate was sealed before he was born, as a vessel fitted for destruction (romans 9:22). If God sealed Esau's fate before he was born; then what's the difference between a baby that's already condemned prior to having been born and the condemnation beforehand for example of an unbelieving elderly individual having been born as well but who lived a long life but who's deeds are still considered evil nonetheless? There is no difference! They both are still considered to be sinners and they both will be condemned as sinners - one having been condemned without works as a sinner (newborn baby) and the other being condemned according to their works as a sinner (elderly individual); and rightfully so. There is no injustice with God; he has the right to fashion each vessel as He sees fit. If a baby is to be condemned; then that baby will be condemned as one who is a sinner without works having not been chosen beforehand prior to it's birth unto salvation. In order for you to argue against my position; then you would have to explain biblically - how is it possible for a baby who is found not to be "in Christ" when born be something other than as to not stand condemned before God as not "in Christ" but still "in Adam" upon their death on judgement day?
The mere fact that if a baby dies prematurely; that baby will die yet still “in Adam” and deserving of death, condemnation and separation from God. The only thing that will save that baby from Hell itself is the mercy of God. However, God’s mercy cannot be demanded. He is free to bestow saving mercy on whomever He wills. Although, we know that God has already chosen beforehand who He has determined to save. In spite of this conclusion, there remains no injustice with God - to His glory (romans 9:14-16).
By Aaron Fisher
See Also:
No comments:
Post a Comment